Every so often I ignore economic rationality and purchase, a little furtively at $45 an edition, a copy of The World of Fine Wine.  Several articles in the edition shown in the picture still have me thinking, so I think that can be taken as a commendation.  One of them was a generally glowing book review of local author Tyson Steltzer's The Champagne Guide 2014-2015.  I haven't yet read the guide, so that's not what caught my eye.  What did was the comment that "my only criticism of this guide, as I say, is the scoring system which is profligate and overgenerous, a sad tendency now among pundits wanting to make a splash".  

I thought this statement interesting given the prevalence in Australia of what might be termed in polite company a generous ethos, where a score in the low 90s practically might be regarded with slight caution rather than admiration.  It is possible therefore Tyson's scoring could be a product of the system as applied in Australia, rather than offered up as an outlier.  This is not an excuse though.  For numerical scores to have more meaning, a lower starting point may be useful, albeit unpalatable and perhaps difficult to adopt once the above path has been taken.  Then there's the matter of whether scores are sensible anyway.  I rather sidestepped the issue and gave up on the whole concept, finding its usefulness waning.

you might also like

Wine Thoughts

No comments:

Post a Comment

To subscribe to Grape Observer please click here.

About is an independent wine review and journal. For further information about your author, please click here. To subscribe to Grape Observer you can click here.