Change to scoring approach

Regular readers will know that I have used a couple of scoring methodologies over the years. Initially, I rated wines out of 10, then I moved to a 100 point scale, which I have used for the last 18 or so months.

Increasingly, I have found that I am being asked to evaluate and be examined on wines using the Wine & Spirits Education Trust (WSET) systematic approach, which identifies wine quality by the descriptions of "faulty", "poor", "acceptable", "good", "very good" and "outstanding". And increasingly, I am finding that this approach to quality identification sits more comfortably and accurately with my descriptions of, and how I actually feel about, the wine. It is perhaps therefore a better method for me to communicate my thoughts on the quality of a wine. It is also more consistent with my ethos that the commentary is more important than the score.

So, therefore, I think a change is in order. For the last few wine reviews, and going forward, I am going to trial using the WSET systematic approach for identifications of quality. If you are in violent or preferably non-violent agreement or objection, please let me know.

Wine Thoughts
August 22, 2012

Featured post

IMW Annual Bordeaux tasting - 2013 vintage

Held in Sydney by the Institute of Masters of Wine on the weekend, this was …

Popular Posts

Exclusive/small production winery mailing lists

Well executed mailing lists provide benefits to consumer and winery alike.  …

Colonel and The Merchant Barossa Shiraz 2016

I tasted this wine blind, not knowing it was a $10 wine.  Actually, it's…

Lucinda Estate Circa 1990 South Gippsland Pinot Noir 2015

A first wine for me from this producer, and a good one.  Lucinda Estate in S…